Earshot

Are you ready to catch every word your watchlist says on podcasts?

Earshot is a daily email. It listens to the shows you follow and sends you what was actually said: exact quotes, timestamped, sorted by company. Five minutes to read.

One message · a 20-minute call · a two-week hand-run pilot · first digest within 48h

What lands in your inbox each morning:

The morning file · from the record REAL MOMENTS, REAL DATES
FTXChanged vs Dec 2021

"I'm in the Ponzi business and it's pretty good." Odd Lots · Apr 2022

Matt Levine, after SBF describes yield farming. Dec 2021: polished testimony in Congress.

BitcoinChanged vs 2021

"Never sell your bitcoin." Nashville keynote · Jul 2024

Trump, on stage. 2021, on Fox: calls it a scam. Policy follows in Mar 2025.

TeslaOn the record

"Boring, bonehead questions are not cool." Q1 2018 earnings call

Musk, to analysts. The stock moved before the call ended.

3 DOCUMENTED MOMENTS EVERY LINE VERBATIM · 0 PARAPHRASED
Works with the shows you follow
Odd LotsInvest Like the BestAll-In20VCBanklessDwarkeshMacroVoices
15-30
sources watched per seat
5 min
morning read
100%
quotes timestamped to the second
20
founding seats, capped

The problem

The line that matters is buried in hour two of a podcast.

You follow 20 to 40 spoken sources. You cannot listen to it all, and unlike text, you cannot skim it. Miss the one line and you hear about it from someone else. On your own beat.

Apr 2022

SBF on the Odd Lots podcast casually describes yield farming as a box kept valuable by new deposits. FTX collapses months later. The warning never appeared in a filing; it lived in audio.

Jul 2024

A national bitcoin stockpile is floated on stage at Bitcoin 2024 in Nashville, unscripted. Crypto trades on it in real time. It becomes actual policy in March 2025.

Sep 2018

Musk spends 2.5 unscripted hours on Joe Rogan. Tesla slides about 6% the next day.

None of it lived in a filing. All of it lived in audio.

What changed

March 12 · Earnings call

"Our runway is in great shape. We are not thinking about raising this year."

CEO, illustrative example · 42:18

August 20 · Podcast interview

"We watch cash burn very closely now. Everything is on the table."

Same CEO, five months later · 1:07:44

Two dated quotes, each linked to the exact second. No opinion added. You judge.

How it works

Only the first step needs you.

01

Pick your sources

The shows you already care about, wherever they live: podcasts, YouTube, X Spaces. Yours, not an algorithm's.

Odd LotsAll-In20VCDwarkeshBankless+ yours
02

It listens and files

Every new episode is captured, and every point is filed by company with its exact timestamp.

Verbatim quoteTimestampCompany file
03

You read, five minutes

A morning read of exact quotes, with what changed since the last time each person spoke.

We do not paraphrase.

Earshot is not a summary tool. Nothing on your page was generated; everything was found and can be checked in one click.

Who it is for

People paid to know first.

Analysts at small funds

AI and crypto coverage where the signal lives on the spoken web, not in filings.

Emerging managers and solo GPs

Institutional-grade coverage without an institutional seat price.

Information-driven investors

Days-plus horizon, edge built on what people said. Not chart signals, ever.

The founding offer

Two weeks, run by hand, for 20 people.

Before the product, the service: give me your 15 to 30 sources and I deliver your digest by email every morning for two weeks, built by hand. $49 flat. If it does not earn a place in your morning, that is the whole fee.

Founding seats after the pilot: $29 per month, locked for 12 months. List price will be $49.

Capped at 20 seats. No free tier: the work is real from day one.

The email is pre-filled with 5 short questions. Two minutes to answer, and they decide your seat.

Before you go

You are one of a handful of people seeing this.

This page is a test, not a launch. Three questions, answer any of them:

  1. Would you, or someone you know in this job, pay for this? Why or why not?
  2. What is confusing or unconvincing on this page?
  3. Who is the one person you would forward this to?